Thomas Barrio<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@sz_duras" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>sz_duras</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Tattered" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Tattered</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@davevolek" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>davevolek</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.org.uk/@christopher" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>christopher</span></a></span> There is a need to rethink Rousseauist freedom (missing in Saito's perspective), to define a Serrian natural contract, while freeing ourselves from the Mumfordian <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/megamachine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>megamachine</span></a>. I don't see how this would be possible without direct and local democracy. Of course, total biopolitics (Foucault, Hard, Negri), and hyperreality (Beaudrillard) bring back to the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/spectacle" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>spectacle</span></a> (Debord), but then we would only be left with cynicism and positive barbarism (Benjamin).</p>