'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M50.3943%2022.237V39.5876H43.5185V22.7481C43.5185%2019.2029%2042.0411%2017.3949%2039.036%2017.3949C35.7325%2017.3949%2034.0778%2019.5338%2034.0778%2023.7585V32.9759H27.2434V23.7585C27.2434%2019.5338%2025.5857%2017.3949%2022.2822%2017.3949C19.2949%2017.3949%2017.8027%2019.2029%2017.8027%2022.7481V39.5876H10.9298V22.237C10.9298%2018.6918%2011.835%2015.8754%2013.6453%2013.7877C15.5128%2011.7049%2017.9623%2010.6355%2021.0028%2010.6355C24.522%2010.6355%2027.1813%2011.9885%2028.9542%2014.6917L30.665%2017.5633L32.3788%2014.6917C34.1517%2011.9885%2036.811%2010.6355%2040.3243%2010.6355C43.3619%2010.6355%2045.8114%2011.7049%2047.6847%2013.7877C49.4931%2015.8734%2050.3963%2018.6899%2050.3943%2022.237Z'%20fill='white'/%3e%3cdefs%3e%3clinearGradient%20id='paint0_linear_89_8'%20x1='30.5'%20y1='0'%20x2='30.5'%20y2='65'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3e%3cstop%20stop-color='%236364FF'/%3e%3cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23563ACC'/%3e%3c/linearGradient%3e%3c/defs%3e%3c/svg%3e)
NERDS<p>We have several open positions, both <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/phd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>phd</span></a> & <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/postdoc" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>postdoc</span></a>: <a href="https://nerds.itu.dk/positions/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">nerds.itu.dk/positions/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>On the topics <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/epidemiology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>epidemiology</span></a> <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/epidemic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>epidemic</span></a> preparedness and <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/networkscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>networkscience</span></a> & <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ai</span></a> & <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/ScienceOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceOfScience</span></a> <br>Deadlines in April and May!</p>
101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.
Administered by:
Server stats:
496active users
101010.pl: About · Status · Profiles directory · Privacy policy
Mastodon: About · Get the app · Keyboard shortcuts · View source code · v4.4.0-alpha.5
#ScienceOfScience
0 posts · 0 participants · 0 posts today
ICSSI<p>📣 Call for abstracts at <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23ICSSI2025" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ICSSI2025</a>! <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23CFP" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CFP</a>
📥 Submit here: <a href="https://www.icssi.org/guidelines" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">www.icssi.org/guidelines</a>
⏳ Deadline: March 14th
On any topic relevant to <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23SciSci" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SciSci</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23Innovation" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Innovation</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23ScienceofScience" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceofScience</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23Metascience" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Metascience</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23STS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#STS</a></p>
Michael Szell<p>Nice, Hinton & Hopfield are exactly among the 70 interdisciplinary papers that "should" have gotten a <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/nobel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nobel</span></a> price, as found by our 2018 paper: <a href="https://mszell.github.io/nobelplot/nobelplot.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mszell.github.io/nobelplot/nob</span><span class="invisible">elplot.html</span></a> <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0314-6" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41567-018</span><span class="invisible">-0314-6</span></a><br><a href="https://datasci.social/tags/ScienceOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceOfScience</span></a></p>
David Chavalarias - EN<p>🔥🔥🔥 <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/CCS2024" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CCS2024</span></a>: Learn how to be a Nobel today !My presentation Room 11 - 12:30 – 12:45</p><p> Get a head start, train ➡️ at <a href="http://winnobel.com" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="">winnobel.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://datasci.social/@yrCSS" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>yrCSS</span></a></span> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/CCS24" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CCS24</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/collectiveIntelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>collectiveIntelligence</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/scienceOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>scienceOfScience</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/gameTheory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gameTheory</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/experimentalEconomics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>experimentalEconomics</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/ABM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ABM</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/complexsystems" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>complexsystems</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/evolutionOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evolutionOfScience</span></a></p>
Ben Waber<p>Next was a wide-ranging talk by Sara Venturini on community detection and research collaboration analysis at the Network Science Institute <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FPPBUt5AOM" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=6FPPBUt5AO</span><span class="invisible">M</span></a> (3/7) <a href="https://hci.social/tags/networks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>networks</span></a> <a href="https://hci.social/tags/ScienceOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceOfScience</span></a></p>
Michael Szell<p>Interesting how our <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/ScienceOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceOfScience</span></a> work on <a href="https://datasci.social/tags/nobel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nobel</span></a> prizes from 2018 foreshadowed this year's prize on quantum dots. But also interesting that only one of these high-cited papers are coauthored by Bawendi (the rightmost white marker), none by Brus or Ekimov.<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0314-6" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41567-018</span><span class="invisible">-0314-6</span></a></p>
Janne Pölönen<p>Save the dates! <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/RESSH2024" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RESSH2024</span></a> is coming. We’ll meet on 23-24 May 2024 in Galway, Ireland. Prepare your contributions for "Open Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Evaluation, Infrastructure, and Practices." <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ResearchEvaluation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchEvaluation</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/SSH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SSH</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/HigherEducation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HigherEducation</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a></p>
Nicole C. Nelson<p>Trying to start off the new academic year right by finally getting myself set up on Mastodon. So, here's my <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/introduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>introduction</span></a> post! </p><p>I'm an <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a> scholar to the core, but I also spend a lot of time in the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/historyofscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>historyofscience</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/historyofmedicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>historyofmedicine</span></a> communities, the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/scienceofscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>scienceofscience</span></a> communities, and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/medicalhumanities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>medicalhumanities</span></a></p>
Mark Rubin<p>"Discretion in research practice should perhaps not be seen as a weakness or a fault in the scientific method, but rather an integral part of it." </p><p>New preprint: <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7dh3t/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7dh</span><span class="invisible">3t/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>Preregistration:</p><p>Interesting new article in the Journal of Trial and Error proposes that we establish core preregistration criteria (i.e., a minimum amount of information required to consider a preregistration complete) and only award preregistered badges only to articles that meet those criteria.</p><p>🦣 Author: <span class="h-card"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@drcpennington" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>drcpennington</span></a></span></p><p>Open access: <a href="https://doi.org/10.36850/mr6" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.36850/mr6</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Preregistration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Preregistration</span></a></p>
Mark Rubin<p>New paper argues insights from qualitative research can help to improve open science.</p><p>Steltenpohl et al. (2023). Rethinking transparency and rigor from a qualitative open science perspective. Journal of Trial & Error. <a href="https://doi.org/10.36850/mr7" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.36850/mr7</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>Theory Evaluation:</p><p>Really interesting new preprint argues “there are multiple kinds of theories, each with unique assessment standards.”</p><p>Miłkowski (<span class="h-card"><a href="https://sciences.social/@MilekPl" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>MilekPl</span></a></span>; 2023). Cognitive metascience: A new approach to the study of theories. <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/xvyz3/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">psyarxiv.com/xvyz3/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/CognitiveMetascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CognitiveMetascience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a></p>
Mark Rubin<p>Open Science and Academic Workload</p><p>New article by Thomas Hostler in the Journal of Trial and Error:</p><p>“There is a high chance that without intervention, increased expectations to engage in open research practices may lead to unacceptable increases in demands on academics.”</p><p>Open access: <a href="https://doi.org/10.36850/mr5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.36850/mr5</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>academicchatter</span></a></span><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicWorkload" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicWorkload</span></a></p>
Mark Rubin<p>🔸New Critical Metascience blog post🔸</p><p>"Opening up open science to epistemic pluralism: Comment on Bazzoli (2022) and some additional thoughts" </p><p><a href="https://open.substack.com/pub/markrubin/p/opening-up-open-science-to-epistemic?r=2bqjb7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">open.substack.com/pub/markrubi</span><span class="invisible">n/p/opening-up-open-science-to-epistemic?r=2bqjb7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a></p>
Mark Rubin<p>My new article on “Questionable Metascience Practices."</p><p>Open access: <a href="https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.36850/mr4</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> </p><p>Few quotes follow: 🧵👉</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PhilSci</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p><p>1/9</p>
Mark Rubin<p>Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective</p><p>“The aim of this paper is to challenge the current quantitative-focused mainstream understanding of transparency and rigor within the open science movement and suggest additional considerations relating to these concepts from qualitative research paradigms.”</p><p>Preprint: <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/bpu5f" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">psyarxiv.com/bpu5f</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@cnsyoung" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>cnsyoung</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>Motives for Not Sharing Data: </p><p>"We found no robust empirical evidence for the claim that not sharing research data for reanalysis is associated with consistency errors." </p><p><a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284243" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">journals.plos.org/plosone/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284243</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>Replications Welcome!</p><p>“Replicators seem to believe that their work is seen as hostile (Nosek and Errington 2020; Nosek et al. 2022). In response, they are likely to see the outside world as a source of threats….However, the current results suggest that replicators possibly overestimate the risk of negative reactions to their work.”</p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2198126" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.</span><span class="invisible">2198126</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>“Responsible research assessment should prioritize theory development and testing over ticking open science boxes”</p><p>New preprint comments on proposals to change hiring and promotion in psychology to become more oriented to open science.</p><p><a href="https://psyarxiv.com/ad74m/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">psyarxiv.com/ad74m/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>Few quotes follow: 🧵👉 </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Psychology</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/psychology" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>psychology</span></a></span><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychJobs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PsychJobs</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>academicchatter</span></a></span> <br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicsunite" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>academicsunite</span></a></span></p>
Mark Rubin<p>New discussion of preregistration argues for “three different categories of accepted papers:</p><p>(i) non-preregistered (confirmatory or exploratory) research,</p><p>(ii) preregistered, confirmatory research and</p><p>(iii) non-preregistered research marked explicitly as exploratory."</p><p>Open access: <a href="https://danielhers.github.io/preregistration.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">danielhers.github.io/preregist</span><span class="invisible">ration.pdf</span></a> </p><p>Mastodonian authors: <span class="h-card"><a href="https://sigmoid.social/@dh" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>dh</span></a></span></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReplicationCrisis</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SociologyofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceofScience</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STS</span></a><br><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Preregistration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Preregistration</span></a><br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/stsing" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stsing</span></a></span></p>
ExploreLive feeds
Mastodon is the best way to keep up with what's happening.
Follow anyone across the fediverse and see it all in chronological order. No algorithms, ads, or clickbait in sight.
Create accountLoginDrag & drop to upload