Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Elucidating" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Elucidating</span></a></span> that's still <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AssholeLicensing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AssholeLicensing</span></a>. </p><p>Compared to <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://ubuntu.social/@ubuntu" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ubuntu</span></a></span> which when I asked them via eMail [years ago] about <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/preinstalling" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>preinstalling</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/UbuntuLTS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UbuntuLTS</span></a> went like: </p><p>'Shure you can do that and sell the systems and provide commercial support as an MSP. Just make shure you don't claim to be affiliated or endorsed by us and follow our trademark guidelines.' </p><p>And I'm shure if I were in the business of offering <em>managed <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Zulip" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Zulip</span></a> Servers</em> for customers, I'm shure <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@zulip" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>zulip</span></a></span> wouldn't mind that as long as either stick to the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FLOSS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FLOSS</span></a>'d version or appropriately license that for customers and not claim to be <em>endorsed or affiliated with Zulip</em>....</p>