mj<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@sascha_wolfer" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>sascha_wolfer</span></a></span> </p><p>I'd say that most things that survive (locally) for long periods of time make the same <a href="https://c.im/tags/evolutionary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evolutionary</span></a> adjustment.</p><p>High efficiency is not <a href="https://c.im/tags/sustainable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sustainable</span></a>, unless periodic catastrophic crashes (in number) are tolerable.</p><p>OTOH, most systems do not come to this accord on their own, the environment in which it lives constrains optimal <a href="https://c.im/tags/efficiency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>efficiency</span></a> attainable. </p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/nonlinear" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nonlinear</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/incompleteness" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>incompleteness</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/limits" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>limits</span></a></p>