101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Server stats:

557
active users

#academicchatter

11 posts10 participants1 post today

There is a difficulty in academia (or at least in philosophy) regarding standard taxonomies of a debate. As you gain expertise, you might become skeptical about standard taxonomies and you might come up with your own division of ideas and views on a given topic. However, when it comes to using your taxonomy in papers/grant proposals/etc., you quickly run into a dilemma: defend your taxonomy in detail, which might make your argument annoyingly reconstructive, or don't defend it in detail, and risk being evaluated as completely ignoring the standard taxonomy and as not knowledgeable enough.

How do you tackle these problems?

I really enjoyed @Felienne's narrative about narratives about Computer Science yesterday. She applied some of the ideas presented in the Glaciers, Gender and Science paper (journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1) to her experiences in the Computer Science / Programming Languages communities. She's also starting a reading club to brainstorm the meaning (and the name?) of the field of "Computer Science".

#ICTOpen
#ICTOpen2025
#NWO
#Conference
#AcademicMastodon
#AcademicChatter
#ICT
#Research
#Networking
#Utrecht
#Jaarbeurs
#ComputerScience
#Programming Languages
#WomenInComputing
#WomenInSTEM
#Glaciology

Fertig Digital Skills — Hallo AI Literacy

Einladung zum Projektabschluss vom swissuniversities-Projekt „Digital Skills im Hochschulkontext“ von #ZHAW #PHZH #BFH #UniNe

🗓️ 26.6.2025
⏰ 14:00 Projektvorstellung und Podiumsdiskussion
🥂 17:00 Apéro riche
📌 ZHAW Angewandte Linguistik, Theaterstrasse 15c, Winterthur

Kommt und diskutiert mit uns, wo die Reise hingeht mit KI in Hochschulen für Studis, Dozierende und Mitarbeitende

zhaw.ch/de/linguistik/ueber-un

ZHAW Angewandte LinguistikFrom Digital Skills to AI Literacy: Abschlussevent des Projekts «Digital Skills in University Contexts»Wie können digitale Technologien und Generative KI beim akademischen Lesen und Schreiben unterstützen? Projektergebnisse und Erfahrungen mit Angeboten zum Maschinellen Übersetzen und wissenschaftlichen Schreiben.

As if I needed more reasons to loathe Elsevier.

Lately I've received peer review requests from Elsevier journals. If I decline their request via the email link, it takes me to a website that has an angry red box that says "Action not allowed."

Ok, so I will email the editor to say I can't do it. That apparently goes to some IT support system, not the editor.

And today I got an email implying I was being unprofessional because I did not respond to their reviewer request.

#academicChatter 1/2

BREAKING: TU Delft Strike programme was just released! 🔥🟥

🗓️ Date: 24 April 2025
📍 Main location: The field between Pulse and the Library
🕛 From 12:00: Free fries, speakers, music, and collective action!

Here’s what the day will look like:
🪧 08:30–12:00: Picket lines, banner making & walkouts
🚶‍♀️ 11:30: Coordinated walkout from all faculties
🎤 12:30: Stage programme with speeches and live music
✊ 13:15: March to Delft city centre
🔬 15:00–16:00+: Science fair & public mini-lectures

More info: linktr.ee/tudelft_strikes

Striking is your legal right.

No lectures. No meetings. No business as usual.

See you on April 24! 🔥🟥

LinktreeTU Delft Strikes | LinktreeTU Delft strikes on April 24 against the destructive budget cuts. Get involved!

"Pierre Poilievre, leader of Canada’s Conservative Party, has pledged to 'end the imposition of woke ideology in the allocation of federal funds for university research' should his party win the Canadian federal election on 28 April."

Scholars allocate most research funding in Canada, even if the federal government sets priorities and establishes envelopes. Regardless, Poilievre's position is anything but reasssuring.

science.org/content/article/ca

Huh. First time I've seen this. A student I've written for in the past is applying to a master's program. Along with the usual cover letter, writing sample, etc., applicants are required them to submit two letters of recommendation themselves.

Is this a thing? I mean, I trust this particular student, but running admissions this way would seem to make any recommendations the committee receives totally useless.