101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Server stats:

483
active users

#celeron

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
0mp at FreeBSD<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@yrabbit" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>yrabbit</span></a></span> I ran <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeBSD</span></a> with <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ZFS</span></a> on a laptop with a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Celeron</span></a> processor and 2 GB RAM. I'm pretty sure insufficient computing resources were not the problem in your case ;)</p>
mgorny-nyan (he) :autism:🙀🚂🐧<p>Fun post: Dave Farquhar, History of <a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/tags/overclocking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>overclocking</span></a></p><p><a href="https://dfarq.homeip.net/history-of-overclocking/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">dfarq.homeip.net/history-of-ov</span><span class="invisible">erclocking/</span></a></p><p>A quote about <a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/tags/Celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Celeron</span></a>:</p><p>&gt; In 1998, Intel released the Celeron to compete with cheap CPUs from AMD and Cyrix. To make it, they took all of the Level 2 cache off a Pentium II, clocked it at 266 or 300 MHz, and sold it at an AMD-like price. But due to the lack of L2 cache, it was slower than a previous-generation Pentium running at 233 MHz, let alone an AMD or Cyrix chip running at 266 or 300 MHz.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; But the L2 cache was the Pentium II’s limiting factor in overclocking. So a 266 MHz Celeron ran happily at 400 MHz, or potentially even 450 MHz, the same speed as the fastest Pentium II at the time. It was slower than a Pentium II at the same speed, but it worked well for 3D gaming.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; But the only people who bought those Celerons were overclockers and people who didn’t know anything about computers. […]</p>
mgorny-nyan (on) :autism:🙀🚂🐧<p>Ciekawy post: Dave Farquhar, History of <a href="https://pol.social/tags/overclocking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>overclocking</span></a></p><p><a href="https://dfarq.homeip.net/history-of-overclocking/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">dfarq.homeip.net/history-of-ov</span><span class="invisible">erclocking/</span></a></p><p>Cytat na temat procesorów <a href="https://pol.social/tags/Celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Celeron</span></a> (tłum. moje):</p><p>&gt; W roku 1998, Intel wydał Celerona, by konkurować z tanimi procesorami AMD i Cyriksa. W tym celu usunięto cache L2 z Pentiuma II, ustawiono zegar na 266 albo 300 MHz, i sprzedawano w cenie zbliżonej do AMD. Ale ze względu na brak cache'a L2, te procesory były mniej wydajne niż Pentium poprzedniej generacji z zegarem 233 MHz, nie wspominając o AMD czy Cyriksach z 266 albo 300 MHz.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Ale cache L2 stanowił ograniczenie dla podkręcania procesorów Pentium II. Więc 266 MHz-owy Celeron z radością&nbsp;chodził przy 400 MHz, albo nawet 450 MHz — podobnie jak najszybsze dostępne wersje Pentium II. Był mniej wydajny niż Pentium II przy tym samym zegarze, ale do gier 3D się nadawał.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Te Celerony kupowały dwa rodzaje osób: overclockerzy, oraz ludzie, którzy nie mieli pojęcia o komputerach. […]</p>
0mp at FreeBSD<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@cuddle" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>cuddle</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@jhx" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>jhx</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mdon.stefanomarinelli.it/@stefano" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>stefano</span></a></span> I used <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ZFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ZFS</span></a> on an <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Intel</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Celeron</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/laptop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>laptop</span></a> with 2 GB RAM. It was reasonably fast. That laptop went all the way from <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeBSD</span></a> 10 to <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeBSD</span></a> 12.</p>
IT News<p>The new “Intel Processor” will replace Pentium and Celeron CPU branding in 2023 - Enlarge (credit: Intel) </p><p>Intel's processor lineup used to be, i... - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1882032" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">arstechnica.com/?p=1882032</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> <a href="https://schleuss.online/tags/intelprocessor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>intelprocessor</span></a> <a href="https://schleuss.online/tags/celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>celeron</span></a> <a href="https://schleuss.online/tags/pentium" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pentium</span></a> <a href="https://schleuss.online/tags/intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>intel</span></a> <a href="https://schleuss.online/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a></p>
Grzegorz Cichocki<p>Ostatnio testowałem laptopa z procesorem Intel <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Celeron</span></a> oraz systemem <span class="h-card"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fedora" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>fedora</span></a></span> 35. Co można oczekiwać od takiego zestawu? Możecie sprawdzić:</p><p><a href="https://rootblog.pl/acer-swift-1-celeron-recenzja/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">rootblog.pl/acer-swift-1-celer</span><span class="invisible">on-recenzja/</span></a></p>
Underscore<p>Ce dimanche, un programme vintage et hard vous attendent ! <br><span class="h-card"><a href="https://m.g3l.org/@mmu_man" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>mmu_man</span></a></span> vous propose de redécouvrir le BP6 à travers son expérience... assez explosive 🔌💥😅 <br>👉 en podcast ici : <a href="https://www.triplea.fr/blog/podcast/emission-underscore-224-du-11-avril-2021/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">triplea.fr/blog/podcast/emissi</span><span class="invisible">on-underscore-224-du-11-avril-2021/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://m.g3l.org/tags/BP6" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BP6</span></a> <a href="https://m.g3l.org/tags/celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>celeron</span></a> <a href="https://m.g3l.org/tags/intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>intel</span></a></p>
cylonapplepie<p>ive managed to migrate physical <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/windows10" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>windows10</span></a> installation into <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/virtualbox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>virtualbox</span></a> with <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/disk2vhd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>disk2vhd</span></a> with some little tweaks; its more a proof-of-concept than useful tool in case of my hardware. </p><p>last time i did similar thing around 2005 with coppermine-based <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/celeron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>celeron</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cpu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>cpu</span></a> and vmware and it was way more awful.</p>