101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Server stats:

526
active users

#academicfraud

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
RenkeSiems<p>Während <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/Clarivate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Clarivate</span></a> Journals von <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Elsevier</span></a> auf hold stellt, weil offenbar von Paper Mills durchseucht, ist die Operation Klinkenputzen wieder voll im Schwange, ausgerechnet zum Thema <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/wissenschaftlichesFehlverhalten" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>wissenschaftlichesFehlverhalten</span></a>. Eine Einführung von echten Experten, da kann man nicht meckern. Aber was denkt man sich da in Dortmund eigentlich?</p><p><a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/academicfraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academicfraud</span></a> <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/surveillancepublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>surveillancepublishing</span></a></p><p><a href="https://forschungsfoerderung.tu-dortmund.de/veranstaltungsprogramm/aktuelles-veranstaltungsprogramm/insights-into-ethics-in-academic-publishingwise24-25/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">forschungsfoerderung.tu-dortmu</span><span class="invisible">nd.de/veranstaltungsprogramm/aktuelles-veranstaltungsprogramm/insights-into-ethics-in-academic-publishingwise24-25/</span></a></p>
Simon Brooke<p>"Our analysis shows that questionable and potentially manipulative GPT-fabricated papers permeate the research infrastructure and are likely to become a widespread phenomenon"</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/LLMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LLMs</span></a> <br><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/StochasticParrots" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StochasticParrots</span></a> <br><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/AcademicFraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicFraud</span></a></p><p><a href="https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/gpt-fabricated-scientific-papers-on-google-scholar-key-features-spread-and-implications-for-preempting-evidence-manipulation/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/</span><span class="invisible">article/gpt-fabricated-scientific-papers-on-google-scholar-key-features-spread-and-implications-for-preempting-evidence-manipulation/</span></a></p>
Miguel Afonso Caetano<p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicPublishing</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Retractions" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Retractions</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AcademicFraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicFraud</span></a>: "Cabanac lists the detector’s findings on his website, but elsewhere online — on the paper-review site PubPeer and on social media — he has explicitly flagged more than 1,700 papers that caught his eye because of their reliance on retracted work. Some authors have thanked Cabanac for alerting them to problems in their references. Others argue that it’s unfair to effectively cast aspersions on their work because of retractions made after publication that, they say, don’t affect their paper.</p><p>Retracted references don’t definitively show that a paper is problematic, notes Tamara Welschot, part of the research-integrity team at Springer Nature in Dordrecht, the Netherlands, but they are a useful sign that a paper might benefit from further scrutiny. (Nature’s news team is independent of its publisher, Springer Nature.)</p><p>Some researchers argue that retraction of references in a narrative review — which describes the state of research in a field — doesn’t necessarily invalidate the original paper. But when studies assessed by a systematic review or meta-analysis are withdrawn, the results of that review should always be recalculated to keep the literature up to date, says epidemiologist Isabelle Boutron at Paris City University."<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02719-5" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-024</span><span class="invisible">-02719-5</span></a></p>
Victoria Stuart 🇨🇦 🏳️‍⚧️<p>[thread] academic fraud</p><p>Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers<br>Manuscripts that don’t disclose AI assistance slip past peer reviewers<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02477-w" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-023</span><span class="invisible">-02477-w</span></a><br>Discussion: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37431946" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3</span><span class="invisible">7431946</span></a></p><p>* 2023-08-09 Physica Scripta published paper<br>* scientific sleuth spotted odd phrase on manuscript’s 3rd page: Regenerate response<br>* phrase is label of ChatGPT button</p><p><a href="https://pubpeer.com/publications/2BA0ED692A31818BE66AAB637BB3BE" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">pubpeer.com/publications/2BA0E</span><span class="invisible">D692A31818BE66AAB637BB3BE</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LLM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LLM</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LargeLanguageModels" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LargeLanguageModels</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>fraud</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AcademicFraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicFraud</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/disinformation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>disinformation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PubPeer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PubPeer</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
The Daily RakeAcademiaLand: Another Honesty Researcher, (((Dan Arielly))), Exposed for Rampant Fraud<br><br><a href="https://dailyrake.ca/2023/08/28/academialand-another-honesty-researcher-dan-arielly-exposed-for-rampant-fraud/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">dailyrake.ca/2023/08/28/academialand-another-honesty-researcher-dan-arielly-exposed-for-rampant-fraud/</a><br><br><a class="hashtag" href="https://poa.st/tag/schools" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Schools</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://poa.st/tag/academicfraud" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicFraud</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://poa.st/tag/danariely" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DanAriely</a>