Back

I've just discovered an opinion by @ed on the Open Source Initiative blog, highlighting how Llama 2 is not #opensource. (I wish I spotted it earlier, when writing my piece on the issue).

The voice of OSI obviously counts, as the organization stewards the open source definition.

The piece states that OSI asked Meta to fix its description of the Llama 2 release, and avoid #openwashing. After a month, it does not seem like it did much. Meta still presents itself as a champion of open AI, thinning down the standard in the process.

https://blog.opensource.org/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source/