Back

@johnww2@noagendasocial.com
He understands it wrong, because he skipped the Dostoevsky part of russian social contract. This part is about population living in shit so government can build more Greatness. russians are always politically engaged, as far as they need moral endorsement in their shitty lives. But the passive part is correct, and it works in same time, they are passive and engaged simultaneously. Mysterious orcish soul

As for anti-war movement, one of the russian imperial cornerstones is that enemies wants to tear their empire apart. It is widely used in russia as excuse to invade Ukraine (NATO is approaching imperial borders to tear down the empire). As far as all resources that russia trades out are extracted from russian colonies (russian heartland is just a swamp territories), they really terrified of possible #decolonization, and they don't even need Dostoevksy to justify this cornerstone. That's why russians always try to avoid any radical protest to not endanger their imperial integrity, and anti-war protest are radical. That's why trough out all the russian invasions, where most of them were the same meat grinders, they never had anti-war protests

So Mr. Anders did some research, that's a fact, but generally he is just exercising in #Westplaining