101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Server stats:

494
active users

#stackexchange

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.

While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.

The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.

That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.

I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.

Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.

In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!

Hmm ... regarding the #StackExchange #Enshittification

I may have jumped the gun.

Upon seeing stories like this, my first reaction is always to grab the data before it gets locked or deleted (which I have done).

But now that I'm looking around, I'm not entirely sure what the hubbub is about ... all I'm seeing right now, is people discovering that StackExchange is allowing AI models to feed off of the data, and that members are not allowed to delete their own questions/comments/answers from the discussion groups.

Okay, that's not great ... but it's also built right into the Creative Commons license there, and has been since Day 1 ... which in many ways is also a good thing.

StackExchange actually provides regular data dumps themselves, directly, of all the site data.

archive.org/details/stackexcha

Maybe there's more to this story that I'm missing? If so, someone please enlighten me.

Internet ArchiveStack Exchange Data Dump : Stack Exchange, Inc. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ArchiveThis is an anonymized dump of all user-contributed content on the Stack Exchange network. Each site is formatted as a separate archive consisting of XML files...

If you post to #StackExchange, you license that content to them under CC-BY-SA. You can't revoke that license, so you can't remove that content.

It shouldn't surprise you that they stop you from trying. Imagine a Wikipedia editor trying to remove their edits.

However, what it does give you is the right to host _all_ of SE elsewhere. To fork it, if SE violates its contract with the community. This is how SE was always designed to work. From an interview with Spolsky:

Replied in thread

@strypey @zeh @alcinnz

Indeed mojeek.com is not the only non-tech-giant #searchEngine (+crawler). From strypey’s mentions + some of my notes:

* #Mojeek ← does their own crawling
* #Metager.org ← does their own crawling
* #SearchMySite.net ← avoid (Cloudflare)
* #Searx ← just proxy software, many instances
* #4get ← another proxy software, about a dozen instances: 4get.ca/instances
* #Gigablast ← does their own crawling, but what happened?.. they were dissolved last year & seem to now be www.alltheinternet.com
* #Ombrelo ← a proxy but more advanced than the others (filters/downranks Cloudflare sites)

#YaCy is notable because it’s a crawler that you can install and operate yourself. YaCy instances can be public-facing and they can also share indexes with each other fedi style apparently. Some Searx instances tap YaCy instances.

I would love to find a searx or 4get instance that rejects the tech giants, but aggregates from YaCy, mojeek, gigablast, metager, maginalia.nu, frogfind.com, & wiby.me.

And I would love it even more if it would make replacements:

* #StackExchange#AnonymousOverflow
* #YouTube#Invideous
* #Medium.com → scribe.rip
* #BBC → BBC’s onion site
* #NYTimes → New York Times’s onion site
* etc.

search.fabiomanganiello.com makes some of those replacements.

4get.caInstance browser4get: Instances

Amazing how fans of code #LLMs overlook inconvenient details in industry's own surveys:
> … respondents with more #AI experience were _less_
> likely to associate AI with productivity gains …
> --theregister.com/2023/09/05/git #theRegister

Sounds like it can replace/augment those with experience levels #lmgt4y #StackOverflow #StackExchange
But actual specialists? Have -1 incentive now to write down their experience. 📉trends ensue.

The Register · AI coding is 'inescapable' and here to stay, says GitLabBy Thomas Claburn

Shape the Future of #ResearchData ! Support "Research Data Management" (#RDM) on #StackExchange!

**Knowledge Exchange:** Share best practices and build a vibrant community.

**Networking:** Connect with like-minded individuals interested in research data management.
**Share Your Expertise:** Contribute to discussions and share experiences.
**Invite Colleagues:** Expand the community.

**Support the Proposal** area51.stackexchange.com/propo

Today, I had a work meeting with a young but eager fellow. We had a chat, I explained a few things, and he agreed with the technical choices I suggested. However, the issue arose when I mentioned writing a few lines of a "tutorial" on how to do certain things. His response: "Can't you make a video?" Surprised (but not too much), I argued that in my opinion, a concise written tutorial is more practical than a pointless video. His reply: "We only watch videos now, even my colleagues look up solutions on YouTube." This is despite the wealth of excellent tutorials on StackExchange and various blogs. I wonder: why waste half an hour watching a video that could be summarized in a few lines of text (saving time for both the producer and the user)?