Nonilex<p>The <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Constitution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Constitution</span></a> set up a <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/SeparationOfPowers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SeparationOfPowers</span></a> among the federal government's <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/coequal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>coequal</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/executive" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>executive</span></a>, <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/legislative" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>legislative</span></a> &amp; <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/judicial" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>judicial</span></a> branches.</p><p>Proponents of a *conservative* legal doctrine called the "<a href="https://masto.ai/tags/UnitaryExecutive" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UnitaryExecutive</span></a>" theory that envisions vast executive authority for a president portray Humphrey's as wrongly decided. They argue that <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ArticleII" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ArticleII</span></a> gives a president sole authority over the executive branch, including the power to fire heads of <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/independent" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>independent</span></a> agencies despite protections under <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a></p>