Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Administered by:

Server stats:

489
active users

101010.pl: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.5.0-alpha.1

#SharedDigitalEurope

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Alek<p>.<span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://eupolicy.social/@TheoLenoir" class="u-url mention">@<span>TheoLenoir</span></a></span> writes in Tech Policy Press about the <a href="https://101010.pl/tags/DSA" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DSA</span></a>, and whether it&#39;s globally applicable.</p><p>Lenoir&#39;s main point is that the <a href="https://101010.pl/tags/DSA" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DSA</span></a>&#39;s foundations rest firmly on a European notion of universality, and other values (and tensions between them) that play out very differently around the world.</p><p>But most interesting for me was the more fundamental issue of trust in regulation. DSA defines a strong state regulator to watch over commercial platforms. And in many places (I would argue, also some inside the EU), these regulators cannot be fully trusted. </p><p>We have been facing the same criticism as we have advocated (as <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://eupolicy.social/@openfuture" class="u-url mention">@<span>openfuture</span></a></span> ) for business-to-govt data sharing rules in the <a href="https://101010.pl/tags/DataAct" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DataAct</span></a> </p><p>I nevertheless think that we have no other choice but to strengthen the role of states and public institutions in online ecosystems. <a href="https://101010.pl/tags/SharedDigitalEurope" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SharedDigitalEurope</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://101010.pl/tags/BrusselsEffect" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>BrusselsEffect</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://techpolicy.press/can-the-dsa-be-useful-outside-europe/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">techpolicy.press/can-the-dsa-b</span><span class="invisible">e-useful-outside-europe/</span></a></p>
Alek<p>Jack Clark has been writing on Twitter about the need of greater public engagement in the AI space. </p><p>I followed up on his reading as the topic of public involvement in digital is high on our priority list at <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://eupolicy.social/@openfuture" class="u-url mention">@<span>openfuture</span></a></span> (<a href="https://101010.pl/tags/SharedDigitalEurope" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SharedDigitalEurope</span></a>).</p><p>Jack Clark and Jess Whittlestone argue for robust govt monitoring of AI space. I like the point that such monitoring-driven policies would be more dynamic.</p><p>Their approach assumes that govts make use of data that is in the open - which would make a good case of the value of OpenX approaches to data, code, research.</p><p>But I would push further: the case they describe is a great example why we need Public Data Commons and B2G data sharing.</p><p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12427" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="">arxiv.org/abs/2108.12427</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
TrendingLive feeds
About