petersuber<p>New study: "The current level of implementation of transformative agreements is insufficient to bring about a large-scale transition to fully <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a>. A key finding…is that TAs maintain market concentration…The three largest commercial publishers <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Elsevier</span></a>, <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SpringerNature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SpringerNature</span></a> &amp; <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Wiley" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Wiley</span></a> dominate, particularly with regard to OA provided through TAs. Together, the 3 publishers accounted for 3/4 of OA articles through TAs."<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Hybrid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Hybrid</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Monopoly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Monopoly</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReadAndPublishAgreements" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReadAndPublishAgreements</span></a></p>