101010.pl is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
101010.pl czyli najstarszy polski serwer Mastodon. Posiadamy wpisy do 2048 znaków.

Server stats:

507
active users

#fossilfools

3 posts3 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@MikeImBack
As expected, provincial/federal governments are using the tariff threat as a smokescreen to manufacture consent for expanded fossil fuel development & production. 🫤

“Tara Marsden, sustainability director for the Gitanyow hereditary chiefs, has previously told CBC News she is worried the push to approve new projects in the face of the economic threats emanating from the United States would sideline environment concerns.

She pointed out that Western LNG has significant backing from Blackstone Inc., a major American asset manager whose CEO publicly endorsed Trump and contributed to his campaign — undermining any notion that the project is needed to push back against the American president.”

As usual, fossil fuel industry spox (and former Liberal MP, Dan McTeague) is on my telly explaining away the sudden rise of gas prices mysteriously coinciding with the May long weekend. Apparently this time it’s a refinery fire in a California and the lower Canadian dollar that’s responsible. (Can’t blame the carbon-tax any more eh, Dan?)

Fuck I hate this clown.

Always follow the oil money.

“Revealed: Trump’s fossil-fuel donors to profit from data-center boom and green rollbacks

Energy Transfer, a top backer of US president, has received requests to power even more energy-guzzling data centers”

#Oiligarchy #FossilFools #ClimateCrisis

theguardian.com/environment/20

The Guardian · Revealed: Trump’s fossil-fuel donors to profit from data-center boom and green rollbacksBy Nina Lakhani
Replied in thread

@ajsadauskas @jaystephens Ta, interesting. I vaguely recall some of that, but your helpful toot defo provided more info than i knew.

I think something like this is why i feel, & tbh remain, so archly cynical... If Straya, & frankly the rest of the world, was genuinely honestly doing all the serious shit needed NOW to decarbonise & ameliorate, then seeking engineering solutions in flood zones like this would be ok. Knowing though that we & most others are totes NOT seriously addressing the crisis, fuels [boom tish] my severe pessimism, coz eg, engineering designs need engineering assumptions [in this case including expected heights & frequency of floods]. Such assumptions necessarily must be predicated on a certain "steady state" belief [plus safety margins thrown in]. That's all fine, IF we had reason to trust such assumptions. I do NOT trust them, simply coz there IS no steady state; humans are continuing to add more & more CO2 & CH4 to Gaia's atmosphere, thus more & more raising the enthalpy, ergo the heating energy, ergo... yada yada.